What Class of Particles Does the Proton Belong to

Subatomic particle

Proton

The quark content of a proton. The color assignment of individual quarks is arbitrary, but all three colors must be present. Forces betwixt quarks are mediated by gluons.
Classification	Baryon
Composition	2 upwards quarks (u), i downwardly quark (d)
Statistics	Fermionic
Family	Hadron
Interactions	Gravity, electromagnetic, weak, strong
Symbol	p , p + , N + , i i H +
Antiparticle	Antiproton
Theorized	William Prout (1815)
Discovered	Observed as H+ by Eugen Goldstein (1886). Identified in other nuclei (and named) by Ernest Rutherford (1917–1920).
Mass	1.672621 923 69(51)×x−27 kg [1] 938.272088 16(29) MeV/c two [two] 1.007276 466 621(53) Da [2]
Mean lifetime	> 3.6×1029 years [3] (stable)
Electric charge	+1e 1.602176 634 ×10−xix C [2]
Charge radius	0.8414(19) fm [2]
Electric dipole moment	< 2.ane×ten−25e⋅cm [four]
Electric polarizability	0.00112(iv) fm3
Magnetic moment	1.410606 797 36(lx)×x−26 J⋅T−1 [2] 1.521032 202 xxx(46)×10−iiiμ B [2] 2.792847 344 63(82)μ N [2]
Magnetic polarizability	one.ix(five)×ten−4 fm3
Spin	1 / two
Isospin	ane / 2
Parity	+one
Condensed	I(J P ) = one / ii ( 1 / 2 +)

A proton is a stable subatomic particle, symbol
p
or
p ⁺
, with a positive electric charge of +anee unproblematic charge. Its mass is slightly less than that of a neutron and 1836 times the mass of an electron. Protons and neutrons, each with masses of approximately ane atomic mass unit, are jointly referred to as "nucleons" (particles nowadays in atomic nuclei).

1 or more protons are present in the nucleus of every atom, which are necessary to provide the attractive electrostatic fundamental force to demark atomic electrons. The number of protons in the nucleus is the defining belongings of an chemical element, and is referred to every bit the atomic number (represented by the symbol Z). Since each element has a unique number of protons, each element has its own unique diminutive number, which determines the number of atomic electrons and consequently the chemic characteristics of the element.

The word proton is Greek for "first", and this name was given to the hydrogen nucleus past Ernest Rutherford in 1920. In previous years, Rutherford had discovered that the hydrogen nucleus (known to be the lightest nucleus) could be extracted from the nuclei of nitrogen by atomic collisions.^[v] Protons were therefore a candidate to be a primal or elementary particle, and hence a building cake of nitrogen and all other heavier atomic nuclei.

Although protons were originally considered elementary particles, in the modernistic Standard Model of particle physics, protons are now known to be composite particles, containing three valence quarks, and together with neutrons are now classified equally hadrons. Protons are composed of 2 up quarks of charge + 2 / three east and 1 down quark of charge − i / three east. The rest masses of quarks contribute only near ane% of a proton's mass.^[6] The remainder of a proton's mass is due to breakthrough chromodynamics binding energy, which includes the kinetic energy of the quarks and the energy of the gluon fields that bind the quarks together. Because protons are not cardinal particles, they possess a measurable size; the root mean square charge radius of a proton is about 0.84–0.87 fm (or 0.84×10⁻¹⁵ to 0.87×10⁻¹⁵ m).^{[7] [8]} In 2019, 2 different studies, using dissimilar techniques, plant the radius of the proton to be 0.833 fm, with an uncertainty of ±0.010 fm.^{[ix] [x]}

Free protons occur occasionally on Earth: thunderstorms tin produce protons with energies of up to several tens of MeV.^{[11] [12]} At sufficiently low temperatures and kinetic energies, free protons will bind to electrons. Nonetheless, the grapheme of such bound protons does non change, and they remain protons. A fast proton moving through thing will slow by interactions with electrons and nuclei, until it is captured past the electron cloud of an atom. The issue is a protonated cantlet, which is a chemical compound of hydrogen. In vacuum, when free electrons are nowadays, a sufficiently tedious proton may pick up a single free electron, becoming a neutral hydrogen atom, which is chemically a free radical. Such "gratis hydrogen atoms" tend to react chemically with many other types of atoms at sufficiently depression energies. When free hydrogen atoms react with each other, they class neutral hydrogen molecules (H_ii), which are the nigh mutual molecular component of molecular clouds in interstellar space.

Costless protons are routinely used for accelerators for proton therapy or various particle physics experiments, with the about powerful instance being the Large Hadron Collider.

Description [edit]

Unsolved trouble in physics:

How exercise the quarks and gluons carry the spin of protons?

Protons are spin- i / 2 fermions and are composed of three valence quarks,^[thirteen] making them baryons (a sub-type of hadrons). The ii upward quarks and one downwards quark of a proton are held together by the stiff force, mediated by gluons.^{[xiv] : 21–22} A modern perspective has a proton composed of the valence quarks (up, up, down), the gluons, and transitory pairs of sea quarks. Protons have a positive accuse distribution which decays approximately exponentially, with a mean square radius of about 0.viii fm.^[15]

Protons and neutrons are both nucleons, which may exist bound together by the nuclear forcefulness to form diminutive nuclei. The nucleus of the most common isotope of the hydrogen atom (with the chemical symbol "H") is a lone proton. The nuclei of the heavy hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium contain one proton bound to one and two neutrons, respectively. All other types of atomic nuclei are composed of two or more protons and various numbers of neutrons.

History [edit]

The concept of a hydrogen-like particle as a constituent of other atoms was developed over a long period. As early as 1815, William Prout proposed that all atoms are composed of hydrogen atoms (which he called "protyles"), based on a simplistic interpretation of early values of atomic weights (see Prout'due south hypothesis), which was disproved when more accurate values were measured.^{[sixteen] : 39–42}

In 1886, Eugen Goldstein discovered canal rays (too known every bit anode rays) and showed that they were positively charged particles (ions) produced from gases. Still, since particles from different gases had different values of charge-to-mass ratio (e/yard), they could not be identified with a single particle, unlike the negative electrons discovered by J. J. Thomson. Wilhelm Wien in 1898 identified the hydrogen ion as the particle with the highest charge-to-mass ratio in ionized gases.^[17]

Following the discovery of the atomic nucleus by Ernest Rutherford in 1911, Antonius van den Broek proposed that the place of each element in the periodic tabular array (its atomic number) is equal to its nuclear accuse. This was confirmed experimentally by Henry Moseley in 1913 using X-ray spectra.

In 1917 (in experiments reported in 1919 and 1925), Rutherford proved that the hydrogen nucleus is present in other nuclei, a result usually described as the discovery of protons.^[18] These experiments began after Rutherford had noticed that, when alpha particles were shot into air (mostly nitrogen), his scintillation detectors showed the signatures of typical hydrogen nuclei as a production. After experimentation Rutherford traced the reaction to the nitrogen in air and found that when alpha particles were introduced into pure nitrogen gas, the effect was larger. In 1919 Rutherford causeless that the blastoff particle merely knocked a proton out of nitrogen, turning it into carbon. Afterward observing Blackett'due south deject sleeping room images in 1925, Rutherford realized that the alpha particle was captivated. After capture of the alpha particle, a hydrogen nucleus is ejected, so that heavy oxygen, not carbon, is the result i.e. Z is not decremented only incremented (see initial proposed reaction below). This was the commencement reported nuclear reaction, ¹⁴N + α → ¹⁷O + p. Rutherford at first thought of our modern "p" in this equation equally a hydrogen ion, H+.

Depending on ane'due south perspective, either 1919 (when it was seen experimentally as derived from some other source than hydrogen) or 1920 (when it was recognized and proposed as an simple particle) may be regarded equally the moment when the proton was 'discovered'.

Rutherford knew hydrogen to be the simplest and lightest element and was influenced by Prout'southward hypothesis that hydrogen was the building block of all elements. Discovery that the hydrogen nucleus is present in other nuclei as an elementary particle led Rutherford to give the hydrogen nucleus H+ a special name every bit a particle, since he suspected that hydrogen, the lightest element, independent only i of these particles. He named this new central building block of the nucleus the proton, afterward the neuter atypical of the Greek word for "starting time", πρῶτον. However, Rutherford as well had in mind the word protyle as used by Prout. Rutherford spoke at the British Association for the Advancement of Scientific discipline at its Cardiff coming together beginning 24 August 1920.^[19] Rutherford starting time proposed (wrongly, encounter to a higher place) that this nitrogen reaction was ¹⁴N + α → ¹⁴C + α + H+. At the coming together, he was asked by Oliver Lodge for a new name for the positive hydrogen nucleus to avert confusion with the neutral hydrogen atom. He initially suggested both proton and prouton (after Prout).^[20] Rutherford later reported that the coming together had accepted his proposition that the hydrogen nucleus exist named the "proton", post-obit Prout's discussion "protyle".^[21] The showtime apply of the word "proton" in the scientific literature appeared in 1920.^{[22] [23]}

Stability [edit]

Unsolved problem in physics:

Are protons fundamentally stable? Or do they decay with a finite lifetime as predicted by some extensions to the standard model?

The gratis proton (a proton not bound to nucleons or electrons) is a stable particle that has not been observed to break down spontaneously to other particles. Free protons are found naturally in a number of situations in which energies or temperatures are high enough to separate them from electrons, for which they have some affinity. Gratis protons exist in plasmas in which temperatures are as well high to allow them to combine with electrons. Free protons of high energy and velocity make up 90% of cosmic rays, which propagate in vacuum for interstellar distances. Free protons are emitted direct from diminutive nuclei in some rare types of radioactive decay. Protons also issue (along with electrons and antineutrinos) from the radioactive decay of gratuitous neutrons, which are unstable.

The spontaneous decay of free protons has never been observed, and protons are therefore considered stable particles according to the Standard Model. However, some grand unified theories (GUTs) of particle physics predict that proton decay should accept place with lifetimes between ten³¹ to 10³⁶ years and experimental searches have established lower premises on the mean lifetime of a proton for various assumed decay products.^{[24] [25] [26]}

Experiments at the Super-Kamiokande detector in Nihon gave lower limits for proton mean lifetime of half dozen.6×10³³ years for disuse to an antimuon and a neutral pion, and 8.ii×x³³ years for decay to a positron and a neutral pion.^[27] Some other experiment at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada searched for gamma rays resulting from residual nuclei resulting from the decay of a proton from oxygen-16. This experiment was designed to detect decay to whatsoever product, and established a lower limit to a proton lifetime of two.i×ten²⁹ years.^[28]

However, protons are known to transform into neutrons through the process of electron capture (also called inverse beta decay). For costless protons, this process does not occur spontaneously just only when energy is supplied. The equation is:

p ⁺
+
e ⁻
→
north
+
ν
_eastward

The process is reversible; neutrons can convert back to protons through beta decay, a common form of radioactive decay. In fact, a complimentary neutron decays this fashion, with a mean lifetime of about 15 minutes. A proton can also transform into neutrons through beta plus disuse (β+ disuse).

Quarks and the mass of a proton [edit]

In quantum chromodynamics, the modern theory of the nuclear forcefulness, most of the mass of protons and neutrons is explained by special relativity. The mass of a proton is most eighty–100 times greater than the sum of the rest masses of its three valence quarks, while the gluons have zero rest mass. The extra energy of the quarks and gluons in a proton, equally compared to the residuum energy of the quarks alone in the QCD vacuum, accounts for almost 99% of the proton's mass. The rest mass of a proton is, thus, the invariant mass of the arrangement of moving quarks and gluons that make upwardly the particle, and, in such systems, even the energy of massless particles is notwithstanding measured as office of the balance mass of the system.

Ii terms are used in referring to the mass of the quarks that make upward protons: electric current quark mass refers to the mass of a quark by itself, while elective quark mass refers to the electric current quark mass plus the mass of the gluon particle field surrounding the quark.^{[29] : 285–286 [thirty] : 150–151} These masses typically have very unlike values. The kinetic energy of the quarks that is a consequence of confinement is a contribution (run across Mass in special relativity). Using lattice QCD calculations, the contributions to the mass of the proton are the quark condensate (∼ix%, comprised past the up and down quarks and a sea of virtual foreign quarks), the quark kinetic energy (∼32%), the gluon kinetic energy (∼37%), and the anomalous gluonic contribution (∼23%, comprised past contributions from condensates of all quark flavors).^[31]

The constituent quark model wavefunction for the proton is

${\displaystyle |p_{\uparrow }\rangle ={\frac {1}{\sqrt {eighteen}}}[2|u_{\uparrow }d_{\downarrow }u_{\uparrow }\rangle +2|u_{\uparrow }u_{\uparrow }d_{\downarrow }\rangle +2|d_{\downarrow }u_{\uparrow }u_{\uparrow }\rangle -|u_{\uparrow }u_{\downarrow }d_{\uparrow }\rangle -|u_{\uparrow }d_{\uparrow }u_{\downarrow }\rangle -|u_{\downarrow }d_{\uparrow }u_{\uparrow }\rangle -|d_{\uparrow }u_{\downarrow }u_{\uparrow }\rangle -|d_{\uparrow }u_{\uparrow }u_{\downarrow }\rangle -|u_{\downarrow }u_{\uparrow }d_{\uparrow }\rangle ].}$

The internal dynamics of protons are complicated, because they are determined by the quarks' exchanging gluons, and interacting with various vacuum condensates. Lattice QCD provides a way of calculating the mass of a proton directly from the theory to whatever accuracy, in principle. The well-nigh contempo calculations^{[32] [33]} claim that the mass is adamant to better than 4% accuracy, even to 1% accurateness (see Figure S5 in Dürr et al. ^[33]). These claims are still controversial, because the calculations cannot even so be washed with quarks equally light as they are in the real earth. This means that the predictions are found past a process of extrapolation, which can introduce systematic errors.^[34] It is hard to tell whether these errors are controlled properly, because the quantities that are compared to experiment are the masses of the hadrons, which are known in accelerate.

These recent calculations are performed by massive supercomputers, and, as noted by Boffi and Pasquini: "a detailed description of the nucleon construction is still missing because ... long-distance behavior requires a nonperturbative and/or numerical treatment ..."^[35] More than conceptual approaches to the construction of protons are: the topological soliton arroyo originally due to Tony Skyrme and the more than accurate AdS/QCD approach that extends it to include a string theory of gluons,^[36] various QCD-inspired models like the bag model and the constituent quark model, which were popular in the 1980s, and the SVZ sum rules, which allow for rough judge mass calculations.^[37] These methods exercise not accept the same accuracy as the more brute-force lattice QCD methods, at to the lowest degree non yet.

Charge radius [edit]

The problem of defining a radius for an diminutive nucleus (proton) is similar to the problem of atomic radius, in that neither atoms nor their nuclei have definite boundaries. However, the nucleus can be modeled as a sphere of positive accuse for the interpretation of electron scattering experiments: because there is no definite boundary to the nucleus, the electrons "run across" a range of cross-sections, for which a mean can be taken. The qualification of "rms" (for "root mean foursquare") arises because it is the nuclear cross-section, proportional to the square of the radius, which is determining for electron scattering.

The internationally accepted value of a proton'south charge radius is 0.8768 fm (run across orders of magnitude for comparison to other sizes). This value is based on measurements involving a proton and an electron (namely, electron scattering measurements and complex calculation involving scattering cross section based on Rosenbluth equation for momentum-transfer cross section), and studies of the atomic free energy levels of hydrogen and deuterium.

Notwithstanding, in 2010 an international research team published a proton charge radius measurement via the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen (an exotic cantlet made of a proton and a negatively charged muon). Equally a muon is 200 times heavier than an electron, its de Broglie wavelength is correspondingly shorter. This smaller atomic orbital is much more than sensitive to the proton's charge radius, so allows more precise measurement. Their measurement of the root-mean-square charge radius of a proton is " 0.84184(67) fm, which differs by 5.0 standard deviations from the CODATA value of 0.8768(69) fm".^[38] In January 2013, an updated value for the charge radius of a proton— 0.84087(39) fm—was published. The precision was improved past one.seven times, increasing the significance of the discrepancy to viiσ.^[8] The 2014 CODATA aligning slightly reduced the recommended value for the proton radius (computed using electron measurements merely) to 0.8751(61) fm, but this leaves the discrepancy at 5.sixσ.

If no errors were institute in the measurements or calculations, it would have been necessary to re-examine the globe'southward most precise and best-tested central theory: quantum electrodynamics.^[39] The proton radius was a puzzle every bit of 2017.^{[40] [41]}

A resolution came in 2019, when two different studies, using different techniques involving the Lamb shift of the electron in hydrogen, and electron–proton handful, found the radius of the proton to be 0.833 fm, with an uncertainty of ±0.010 fm, and 0.831 fm.^{[9] [ten]}

The radius of the proton is linked to the form factor and momentum-transfer cross department. The atomic form factor G modifies the cross section corresponding to point-like proton.

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}R_{\text{e}}^{2}&=-half dozen{{\frac {dG_{\text{e}}}{dq^{2}}}\,{\Bigg \vert }\,}_{q^{ii}=0}\\{\frac {d\sigma }{d\Omega }}\ &={{\frac {d\sigma }{d\Omega }}\,{\Bigg \vert }\,}_{\text{bespeak}}G^{2}(q^{2})\finish{aligned}}}$

The atomic class factor is related to the wave function density of the target:

${\displaystyle G(q^{2})=\int e^{iqr}\psi (r)^{2}\,dr^{3}}$

The course factor tin can exist split up in electric and magnetic form factors. These tin be farther written every bit linear combinations of Dirac and Pauli form factors.^[41]

${\displaystyle {\brainstorm{aligned}G_{\text{m}}&=F_{\text{D}}+F_{\text{P}}\\G_{\text{e}}&=F_{\text{D}}-\tau F_{\text{P}}\\{\frac {d\sigma }{d\Omega }}&={{\frac {d\sigma }{d\Omega }}\,{\Bigg \vert }\,}_{NS}{\frac {1}{1+\tau }}\left(G_{\text{eastward}}^{two}\left(q^{ii}\right)+{\frac {\tau }{\epsilon }}G_{\text{yard}}^{2}\left(q^{2}\correct)\right)\finish{aligned}}}$

Pressure inside the proton [edit]

Since the proton is composed of quarks confined by gluons, an equivalent pressure which acts on the quarks can be divers. This allows calculation of their distribution every bit a function of distance from the centre using Compton scattering of high-energy electrons (DVCS, for deeply virtual Compton scattering). The pressure is maximum at the centre, about 10³⁵ Pa, which is greater than the pressure inside a neutron star.^[42] It is positive (repulsive) to a radial distance of about 0.half-dozen fm, negative (bonny) at greater distances, and very weak beyond about 2 fm.

Charge radius in solvated proton, hydronium [edit]

The radius of the hydrated proton appears in the Born equation for computing the hydration enthalpy of hydronium.

Interaction of free protons with ordinary thing [edit]

Although protons take analogousness for oppositely charged electrons, this is a relatively low-free energy interaction and and then free protons must lose sufficient velocity (and kinetic energy) in society to become closely associated and spring to electrons. High energy protons, in traversing ordinary matter, lose energy by collisions with atomic nuclei, and by ionization of atoms (removing electrons) until they are slowed sufficiently to exist captured by the electron deject in a normal cantlet.

However, in such an association with an electron, the grapheme of the leap proton is not changed, and information technology remains a proton. The allure of low-energy free protons to any electrons present in normal matter (such as the electrons in normal atoms) causes free protons to stop and to form a new chemic bail with an cantlet. Such a bail happens at whatever sufficiently "common cold" temperature (that is, comparable to temperatures at the surface of the Sunday) and with whatever type of cantlet. Thus, in interaction with any blazon of normal (non-plasma) matter, low-velocity free protons practice not remain gratis simply are attracted to electrons in whatsoever atom or molecule with which they come up into contact, causing the proton and molecule to combine. Such molecules are and then said to exist "protonated", and chemically they are just compounds of hydrogen, ofttimes positively charged. Often, equally a result, they get so-chosen Brønsted acids. For instance, a proton captured by a water molecule in water becomes hydronium, the aqueous cation H_threeO⁺ .

Proton in chemistry [edit]

Atomic number [edit]

In chemistry, the number of protons in the nucleus of an atom is known as the atomic number, which determines the chemic chemical element to which the cantlet belongs. For example, the atomic number of chlorine is 17; this means that each chlorine cantlet has 17 protons and that all atoms with 17 protons are chlorine atoms. The chemical properties of each atom are determined past the number of (negatively charged) electrons, which for neutral atoms is equal to the number of (positive) protons and so that the total charge is goose egg. For example, a neutral chlorine atom has 17 protons and 17 electrons, whereas a Cl⁻ anion has 17 protons and 18 electrons for a total accuse of −one.

All atoms of a given element are non necessarily identical, nevertheless. The number of neutrons may vary to class unlike isotopes, and free energy levels may differ, resulting in unlike nuclear isomers. For example, there are two stable isotopes of chlorine: ³⁵
₁₇ Cl
with 35 − 17 = xviii neutrons and ³⁷
₁₇ Cl
with 37 − 17 = xx neutrons.

Hydrogen ion [edit]

Protium, the most common isotope of hydrogen, consists of one proton and one electron (it has no neutrons). The term "hydrogen ion" (H ⁺
) implies that that H-cantlet has lost its one electron, causing only a proton to remain. Thus, in chemistry, the terms "proton" and "hydrogen ion" (for the protium isotope) are used synonymously

The proton is a unique chemical species, being a blank nucleus. Every bit a consequence information technology has no contained existence in the condensed country and is invariably plant spring by a pair of electrons to another atom.

Ross Stewart, The Proton: Application to Organic Chemistry (1985, p. 1)

In chemistry, the term proton refers to the hydrogen ion, H ⁺
. Since the atomic number of hydrogen is 1, a hydrogen ion has no electrons and corresponds to a bare nucleus, consisting of a proton (and 0 neutrons for the nigh abundant isotope protium ^ane
₁ H
). The proton is a "bare charge" with just about 1/64,000 of the radius of a hydrogen atom, and then is extremely reactive chemically. The costless proton, thus, has an extremely curt lifetime in chemical systems such as liquids and it reacts immediately with the electron cloud of any available molecule. In aqueous solution, information technology forms the hydronium ion, H_threeO⁺, which in turn is farther solvated by water molecules in clusters such as [H_fiveO_two]⁺ and [H₉O_four]⁺.^[43]

The transfer of H ⁺
in an acid–base reaction is unremarkably referred to as "proton transfer". The acid is referred to as a proton donor and the base of operations every bit a proton acceptor. Also, biochemical terms such equally proton pump and proton aqueduct refer to the movement of hydrated H ⁺
ions.

The ion produced by removing the electron from a deuterium atom is known as a deuteron, not a proton. Likewise, removing an electron from a tritium cantlet produces a triton.

Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [edit]

Also in chemical science, the term "proton NMR" refers to the ascertainment of hydrogen-i nuclei in (more often than not organic) molecules by nuclear magnetic resonance. This method uses the quantized magnetic moment due to the angular momentum (or spin) of the proton, equal to one-half the reduced Planck constant. ( ${\displaystyle \hbar /2}$ ). The name refers to examination of protons as they occur in protium (hydrogen-one atoms) in compounds, and does not imply that gratuitous protons exist in the compound being studied.

Human exposure [edit]

The Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Packages (ALSEP) determined that more than 95% of the particles in the solar wind are electrons and protons, in approximately equal numbers.^{[44] [45]}

Considering the Solar Air current Spectrometer made continuous measurements, it was possible to measure out how the Earth's magnetic field affects arriving solar current of air particles. For about two-thirds of each orbit, the Moon is outside of the Earth'due south magnetic field. At these times, a typical proton density was 10 to twenty per cubic centimeter, with virtually protons having velocities between 400 and 650 kilometers per second. For about five days of each month, the Moon is within the World's geomagnetic tail, and typically no solar wind particles were detectable. For the remainder of each lunar orbit, the Moon is in a transitional region known equally the magnetosheath, where the World'south magnetic field affects the solar wind, but does not completely exclude it. In this region, the particle flux is reduced, with typical proton velocities of 250 to 450 kilometers per second. During the lunar nighttime, the spectrometer was shielded from the solar current of air by the Moon and no solar wind particles were measured.^[44]

Protons likewise have extrasolar origin from galactic cosmic rays, where they make up about 90% of the total particle flux. These protons often have higher free energy than solar air current protons, and their intensity is far more than uniform and less variable than protons coming from the Sun, the production of which is heavily afflicted past solar proton events such equally coronal mass ejections.

Research has been performed on the dose-rate effects of protons, as typically found in space travel, on human wellness.^{[45] [46]} To be more specific, at that place are hopes to identify what specific chromosomes are damaged, and to define the impairment, during cancer development from proton exposure.^[45] Some other study looks into determining "the furnishings of exposure to proton irradiation on neurochemical and behavioral endpoints, including dopaminergic performance, amphetamine-induced conditioned taste disfavor learning, and spatial learning and memory as measured by the Morris water maze.^[46] Electric charging of a spacecraft due to interplanetary proton bombardment has likewise been proposed for study.^[47] There are many more studies that pertain to space travel, including galactic cosmic rays and their possible health effects, and solar proton effect exposure.

The American Biostack and Soviet Biorack infinite travel experiments take demonstrated the severity of molecular damage induced by heavy ions on microorganisms including Artemia cysts.^[48]

Antiproton [edit]

CPT-symmetry puts strong constraints on the relative properties of particles and antiparticles and, therefore, is open to stringent tests. For example, the charges of a proton and antiproton must sum to exactly cypher. This equality has been tested to one part in 10⁸ . The equality of their masses has likewise been tested to better than one role in ten⁸ . By holding antiprotons in a Penning trap, the equality of the charge-to-mass ratio of protons and antiprotons has been tested to ane office in vi×10^nine .^[49] The magnetic moment of antiprotons has been measured with mistake of 8×10⁻³ nuclear Bohr magnetons, and is plant to exist equal and contrary to that of a proton.^[fifty]

Encounter likewise [edit]

• Fermion field
• Hydrogen
• Hydron (chemical science)
• List of particles
• Proton–proton chain
• Quark model
• Proton spin crisis
• Proton therapy

References [edit]

1. ^ "2018 CODATA Value: proton mass". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. NIST. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 2019-05-20 .
2. ^ ^{a b c d e f g} ""2018 CODATA recommended values"".
3. ^ The SNO+ Collaboration; Anderson, M.; Andringa, S.; Arushanova, E.; Asahi, S.; Askins, K.; Auty, D. J.; Dorsum, A. R.; Barnard, Z.; Barros, N.; Bartlett, D. (2019-02-20). "Search for invisible modes of nucleon decay in h2o with the SNO+ detector". Concrete Review D. 99 (3): 032008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.032008.
4. ^ Sahoo, B. K. (2017-01-17). "Improved limits on the hadronic and semihadronic $CP$ violating parameters and function of a nighttime force carrier in the electrical dipole moment of $^{199}\mathrm{Hg}$". Physical Review D. 95 (1): 013002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.013002.
5. ^ "proton | Definition, Mass, Charge, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica . Retrieved 2018-ten-twenty .
6. ^ Cho, Adrian (ii April 2010). "Mass of the Common Quark Finally Nailed Down". Science Magazine. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved 27 September 2014.
7. ^ "Proton size puzzle reinforced!". Paul Shearer Found. 25 January 2013.
8. ^ ^{a b} Antognini, Aldo; et al. (25 Jan 2013). "Proton Structure from the Measurement of 2S-2P Transition Frequencies of Muonic Hydrogen" (PDF). Science. 339 (6118): 417–420. Bibcode:2013Sci...339..417A. doi:10.1126/science.1230016. hdl:10316/79993. PMID 23349284. S2CID 346658.
9. ^ ^{a b} Bezginov, Due north.; Valdez, T.; Horbatsch, M.; Marsman, A.; Vutha, A. C.; Hessels, E. A. (2019-09-06). "A measurement of the atomic hydrogen Lamb shift and the proton charge radius". Science. 365 (6457): 1007–1012. Bibcode:2019Sci...365.1007B. doi:10.1126/science.aau7807. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 31488684. S2CID 201845158.
10. ^ ^{a b} Xiong, W.; Gasparian, A.; Gao, H.; Dutta, D.; Khandaker, G.; Liyanage, N.; Pasyuk, E.; Peng, C.; Bai, 10.; Ye, 50.; Gnanvo, Grand. (November 2019). "A small proton charge radius from an electron–proton scattering experiment". Nature. 575 (7781): 147–150. Bibcode:2019Natur.575..147X. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2. ISSN 1476-4687. OSTI 1575200. PMID 31695211. S2CID 207831686.
11. ^ Köhn, C.; Ebert, U. (2015). "Calculation of beams of positrons, neutrons and protons associated with terrestrial gamma-ray flashes" (PDF). Periodical of Geophysical Inquiry: Atmospheres. 23 (4): 1620–1635. Bibcode:2015JGRD..120.1620K. doi:10.1002/2014JD022229.
12. ^ Köhn, C.; Diniz, Thousand.; Harakeh, Muhsin (2017). "Product mechanisms of leptons, photons, and hadrons and their possible feedback shut to lightning leaders". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 122 (2): 1365–1383. Bibcode:2017JGRD..122.1365K. doi:10.1002/2016JD025445. PMC5349290. PMID 28357174.
13. ^ Adair, R. 1000. (1989). The Bang-up Design: Particles, Fields, and Creation. Oxford Academy Press. p. 214. Bibcode:1988gdpf.volume.....A.
14. ^ Cottingham, W. North.; Greenwood, D. A. (1986). An Introduction to Nuclear Physics. Cambridge Academy Printing. ISBN978-0-521-65733-4.
15. ^ Basdevant, J.-L.; Rich, J.; Spiro, Chiliad. (2005). Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics. Springer. p. 155. ISBN978-0-387-01672-6.
16. ^ Section of Chemistry and Biochemistry UCLA Eric R. Scerri Lecturer (2006-10-12). The Periodic Tabular array : Its Story and Its Significance: Its Story and Its Significance. Oxford University Printing. ISBN978-0-19-534567-4.
17. ^ Wien, Wilhelm (1904). "Über positive Elektronen und die Existenz hoher Atomgewichte". Annalen der Physik. 318 (4): 669–677. Bibcode:1904AnP...318..669W. doi:10.1002/andp.18943180404.
18. ^ Petrucci, R. H.; Harwood, West. Southward.; Herring, F. One thousand. (2002). General Chemical science (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall. p. 41. ISBN978-0-13-033445-nine.
19. ^ Encounter meeting report and annunciation
20. ^ Romer A (1997). "Proton or prouton? Rutherford and the depths of the atom". American Journal of Physics. 65 (8): 707. Bibcode:1997AmJPh..65..707R. doi:10.1119/ane.18640.
21. ^ Rutherford reported credence past the British Association in a footnote to Masson, O. (1921). "XXIV. The constitution of atoms". Philosophical Mag. Serial 6. 41 (242): 281–285. doi:x.1080/14786442108636219.
22. ^ OED "proton". Oxford English Lexicon (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. Retrieved 24 March 2021. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
23. ^ Pais, A. (1986). In Bound . Oxford University Press. p. 296. ISBN0-19-851997-four. Pais believed the start science literature use of the word proton occurs in "Physics at the British Association". Nature. 106 (2663): 357–358. 1920. Bibcode:1920Natur.106..357.. doi:10.1038/106357a0.
24. ^ Buccella, F.; Miele, G.; Rosa, L.; Santorelli, P.; Tuzi, T. (1989). "An upper limit for the proton lifetime in SO(10)". Physics Messages B. 233 (one–2): 178–182. Bibcode:1989PhLB..233..178B. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90637-0.
25. ^ Lee, D.G.; Mohapatra, R.; Parida, M.; Rani, M. (1995). "Predictions for the proton lifetime in minimal nonsupersymmetric And then(10) models: An update". Physical Review D. 51 (1): 229–235. arXiv:hep-ph/9404238. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51..229L. doi:x.1103/PhysRevD.51.229. PMID 10018289.
26. ^ "Proton lifetime is longer than 10³⁴ years". Kamioka Observatory. November 2009.
27. ^ Nishino, H.; et al. (2009). "Search for Proton Disuse via p→east⁺π⁰ and p→μ⁺π⁰ in a Big Water Cherenkov Detector". Concrete Review Letters. 102 (14): 141801. arXiv:0903.0676. Bibcode:2009PhRvL.102n1801N. doi:ten.1103/PhysRevLett.102.141801. PMID 19392425. S2CID 32385768.
28. ^ Ahmed, S.; et al. (2004). "Constraints on Nucleon Disuse via Invisible Modes from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory". Physical Review Messages. 92 (10): 102004. arXiv:hep-ex/0310030. Bibcode:2004PhRvL..92j2004A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.102004. PMID 15089201. S2CID 119336775.
29. ^ Watson, A. (2004). The Quantum Quark. Cambridge University Press. pp. 285–286. ISBN978-0-521-82907-6.
30. ^ Smith, Timothy Paul (2003). Subconscious Worlds: Hunting for Quarks in Ordinary Matter. Princeton University Press. Bibcode:2003hwhq.volume.....S. ISBN978-0-691-05773-6.
31. ^ André Walker-Loud (19 November 2018). "Dissecting the Mass of the Proton". Physics. Vol. 11. p. 118. Bibcode:2018PhyOJ..11..118W. doi:ten.1103/Physics.eleven.118 . Retrieved 2021-06-04 .
32. ^ See this news report Archived 2009-04-xvi at the Wayback Motorcar and links
33. ^ ^{a b} Durr, S.; Fodor, Z.; Frison, J.; Hoelbling, C.; Hoffmann, R.; Katz, S.D.; Krieg, Southward.; Kurth, T.; Lellouch, L.; Lippert, T.; Szabo, K.K.; Vulvert, M. (2008). "Ab Initio Determination of Lite Hadron Masses". Science. 322 (5905): 1224–1227. arXiv:0906.3599. Bibcode:2008Sci...322.1224D. CiteSeerX10.1.1.249.2858. doi:x.1126/science.1163233. PMID 19023076. S2CID 14225402.
34. ^ Perdrisat, C. F.; Punjabi, 5.; Vanderhaeghen, M. (2007). "Nucleon electromagnetic form factors". Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics. 59 (ii): 694–764. arXiv:hep-ph/0612014. Bibcode:2007PrPNP..59..694P. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2007.05.001. S2CID 15894572.
35. ^ Boffi, Sigfrido; Pasquini, Barbara (2007). "Generalized parton distributions and the structure of the nucleon". Rivista del Nuovo Cimento. 30 (9): 387. arXiv:0711.2625. Bibcode:2007NCimR..xxx..387B. doi:10.1393/ncr/i2007-10025-vii. S2CID 15688157.
36. ^ Joshua, Erlich (December 2008). "Recent Results in AdS/QCD". Proceedings, 8th Conference on Quark Solitude and the Hadron Spectrum, September 1–six, 2008, Mainz, Germany. arXiv:0812.4976. Bibcode:2008arXiv0812.4976E.
37. ^ Pietro, Colangelo; Alex, Khodjamirian (October 2000). "QCD Sum Rules, a Modernistic Perspective". In Thou., Shifman (ed.). At the Borderland of Particle Physics: Handbook of QCD. Earth Scientific Publishing. pp. 1495–1576. arXiv:hep-ph/0010175. Bibcode:2001afpp.book.1495C. CiteSeerXx.1.1.346.9301. doi:x.1142/9789812810458_0033. ISBN978-981-02-4445-three. S2CID 16053543.
38. ^ Pohl, Randolf; et al. (8 July 2010). "The size of the proton". Nature. 466 (7303): 213–216. Bibcode:2010Natur.466..213P. doi:10.1038/nature09250. PMID 20613837. S2CID 4424731.
39. ^ Researchers Observes Unexpectedly Small-scale Proton Radius in a Precision Experiment. AZo Nano. July 9, 2010
40. ^ Conover, Emily (2017-04-18). "There's still a lot we don't know virtually the proton". Science News . Retrieved 2017-04-29 .
41. ^ ^{a b} Carlson, Carl E. (May 2015). "The proton radius puzzle". Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics. 82: 59–77. arXiv:1502.05314. Bibcode:2015PrPNP..82...59C. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.01.002. S2CID 54915587.
42. ^ Burkert, Five. D.; Elouadrhiri, L.; Girod, F. X. (16 May 2018). "The pressure distribution inside the proton". Nature. 557 (7705): 396–399. Bibcode:2018Natur.557..396B. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0060-z. OSTI 1438388. PMID 29769668. S2CID 21724781.
43. ^ Headrick, J. Chiliad.; Diken, E. G.; Walters, R. S.; Hammer, N. I.; Christie, R. A.; Cui, J.; Myshakin, Due east. G.; Duncan, Grand. A.; Johnson, Yard. A.; Jordan, K. D. (2005). "Spectral Signatures of Hydrated Proton Vibrations in H2o Clusters". Science. 308 (5729): 1765–1769. Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1765H. doi:10.1126/science.1113094. PMID 15961665. S2CID 40852810.
44. ^ ^{a b} "Apollo 11 Mission". Lunar and Planetary Constitute. 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-12 .
45. ^ ^{a b c} "Space Travel and Cancer Linked? Stony Brook Researcher Secures NASA Grant to Study Furnishings of Space Radiation". Brookhaven National Laboratory. 12 Dec 2007. Archived from the original on 26 November 2008. Retrieved 2009-06-12 .
46. ^ ^{a b} Shukitt-Unhurt, B.; Szprengiel, A.; Pluhar, J.; Rabin, B. M.; Joseph, J. A. (2004). "The furnishings of proton exposure on neurochemistry and beliefs". Advances in Space Research. 33 (eight): 1334–ix. Bibcode:2004AdSpR..33.1334S. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.x.038. PMID 15803624. Archived from the original on 2011-07-25. Retrieved 2009-06-12 .
47. ^ Greenish, North. W.; Frederickson, A. R. (2006). "A Study of Spacecraft Charging due to Exposure to Interplanetary Protons" (PDF). AIP Briefing Proceedings. 813: 694–700. Bibcode:2006AIPC..813..694G. CiteSeerX10.1.1.541.4495. doi:x.1063/i.2169250. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-05-27. Retrieved 2009-06-12 .
48. ^ Planel, H. (2004). Space and life: an introduction to space biological science and medicine. CRC Press. pp. 135–138. ISBN978-0-415-31759-7.
49. ^ Gabrielse, G. (2006). "Antiproton mass measurements". International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 251 (2–3): 273–280. Bibcode:2006IJMSp.251..273G. doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2006.02.013.
50. ^ "Base of operations precisely measures antiproton's magnetic moment". CERN . Retrieved 2022-03-04 .

External links [edit]

• Media related to Protons at Wikimedia Commons
• Particle Data Group at LBL
• Big Hadron Collider
• Eaves, Laurence; Copeland, Ed; Padilla, Antonio (Tony) (2010). "The shrinking proton". Sixty Symbols. Brady Haran for the University of Nottingham.

petersthrainater1946.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton

Share this post